Here, we assume that your code only needs the simplest and most common variety, and is process-local. That needs to worry about multiple different types of mutex such as recursive or error-checking varieties. (It needs to be an integer because that's the size of datatype that futexes use.) Note that the glibc pthread_mutex_t is much more complex. So this is slightly inefficient, but since system calls are quite slow compared to a few extra asm mov instructions this doesn't matter much.įor data hiding, define a type for the mutex state. Not all of the parameters are used in every futex operation (which is multiplexed by the "op" parameter. Return syscall(SYS_futex, addr1, op, val1, timeout, addr2, val3) Int sys_futex(void *addr1, int op, int val1, struct timespec *timeout, void *addr2, int val3) However, this doesn't stop us making our own: Unfortunately, the futex include file does not have this as futexes are a low-level interface typically used in assembly language. To implement mutexes we firstly require a definition of the kernel syscall interface. Unfortunately, the results are not particularly fast, so a more traditional design is better. The best one can do is use the undocumented FUTEX_BITSET flag and have effectively 32 different wait-lists. A further problem is that the futex implementation doesn't allow one to choose exactly which thread can be woken up.
IMPLEMENT SEMAPHORE P V WITH PTHREAD C FULL
Thus the full overhead of a context switch is always required as soon as the lock becomes contended. Since only the "correct" waiter can proceed after an unlock, it prevents any queue-jumping. However, ticket locks are problematic with sleeping waiters. Note that one may naively want to use the faster ticket spinlock algorithm as a base for a mutex implementation. By constructing a state diagram we can look at all possible transitions, and thus write some code. In his article, Ulrich defines these three states to be the integers 0 for unlocked, 1 for locked, and 2 for locked and contended. A mutex must have a third state which describes whether or not the lock is contended, with some threads waiting inside the kernel. A spin lock may only have two states: locked and unlocked.
Implementing mutexes is more complex than spin locks. Instead, to understand what is really available, one needs to investigate the Linux Kernel commit logs in git. In addition, the man pages for the futex system call are also out of date. However, this document is now out of date due to expansion of the futex API over the past few years. It describes how one may construct a mutex library using them, and several of the pitfalls along the way. Ulrich Drepper has written a seminal article on the use of futexes called Futexes Are Tricky. (Notably the FUTEX_FD option which associates a file descriptor to a futex can miss wakeups.) Thus wrapping futexes in a highly efficient library which implements the easier to understand and use mutex and condition variable primitives is helpful. There are many race conditions one needs to be aware of, and part of the API is broken beyond repair. Programming using raw futexes is not simple. The "futex" API in Linux is aimed at satisfying this goal. Since system calls are relatively slow compared to atomic instructions, we would like to minimize their number and avoid as many userspace-kernelspace context switches as possible. In order for this to happen, some communication is required with the operating system kernel via system calls.
Mutexes and Condition Variables differ from spinlocks and spin read-write locks because they require threads to be able to sleep in some sort of wait-queue. What I expect is the host client can concurrently send the data.Mutexes and Condition Variables using Futexes The problem is that debugger showed me this kind of errors: "E0147", and "C22371".ĭouble delta(double a, double b, double c) This C program has to compute the solutions of a quadratic equation.
0 kommentar(er)
